Are we discussing someone's code or the spec? If the spec is what's meant, then the OWF draft may well collide in some (usally arcance) respect with the IETF's processes (which like everything in this realm are a PITA).
I would think that changing the IPR status of the spec at this point could muck up formation of an IETF WG and would be undesirable but maybe someone's already checked all that out? S. Chris Messina wrote: > We're wanting to adopt the Open Web Foundation contribution license: > > http://groups.google.com/group/open-web-legal/web/owf-final-specification-agreement---proposed-draft > > Chris > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Hubert Le Van Gong <hubert...@gmail.com > <mailto:hubert...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > What's the IPR policy for contributing to OAuth? > I've seen an old thread about an IPR contribution license > > (http://groups.google.com/group/oauth/browse_thread/thread/c42aefc5abd9b059?pli=1) > but it seems it has not yielded a final document. At least I can't see > it anywhere on the site - or maybe I missed it. > > Hubert > > > > > > -- > Chris Messina > Open Web Advocate > > factoryjoe.com <http://factoryjoe.com> // diso-project.org > <http://diso-project.org> // openid.net <http://openid.net> // > vidoop.com <http://vidoop.com> > This email is: [ ] bloggable [X] ask first [ ] private > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to oauth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
