+1 for redirect_uri -- highest semantic value imho.
-Naitik On Apr 16, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Evan Gilbert wrote: > We should use the same name in the User-Agent and Web Callback flows. Also, > although the authorization server won't be allowing JSONP requests, > "callback" has become a bit of a defacto standard for JSONP and it would be > nice to use a term that isn't overloaded? > > Can we make them both "redirection"? Even better, maybe "redirect_uri"? > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Luke Shepard <lshep...@facebook.com> wrote: > Facebook API requests are protected resources. They can be called either in a > browser or in a server-to-server environment. > > For example, a JSONP call for my name looks like this: > > > https://api.facebook.com/restserver.php?api_key=361900759629&call_id=1271436355034&callback=FB.RestServer._callback&format=json&method=fql.query&query=SELECT%20name%20FROM%20user%20WHERE%20uid%3D2901279&v=1.0 > > The output (you can play with it here: http://fbrell.com/fb.api/everyone-data > ): > > FB.RestServer._callback([{"name":"Luke Shepard"}]); > > If we want that protected resource to take an access token as well, then it > would look like: > > > https://api.facebook.com/restserver.php?....&callback=FB.RestServer._callback&access_token=ACCESS_TOKEN > > The "callback" parameter is used pretty universally for JSONP requests. For > instance, see the Jquery docs: http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.getJSON/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rbar...@bbn.com] > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 9:10 AM > To: Luke Shepard > Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; Naitik Shah; OAuth WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri > > Could you clarify a little more the environment in which this > confusion arose? What do you mean when you say "The protected > resource typically accepts 'callback' as a parameter to support > JSONP."? What sort of software are you including in this? > > --Richard > > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Luke Shepard wrote: > > > We already had one developer try it out and get confused because the > > server tried to treat the callback URL as a JSONP callback. > > > > The protected resource typically accepts "callback" as a parameter > > to support JSONP. If a developer accidentally passes in callback > > there (maybe they got confused) then the server can't give a normal > > error message - instead it needs to either detect that it looks like > > a URL or otherwise reject it. > > > > On a related note, I think it's more confusing calling it something > > different in the user-agent flow (redirector) when it's essentially > > doing the same thing. > > > > > > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On > > Behalf Of Eran Hammer-Lahav > > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:37 AM > > To: Naitik Shah; OAuth WG > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri > > > > I don't think it is that confusing. Its a completely different > > context from where JSON-P is used (note that in the User-Agent flow > > it is called something else). > > > > EHL > > > > > > On 4/10/10 12:35 PM, "Naitik Shah" <nai...@facebook.com> wrote: > > > > With the simplified params, the callback url parameter is now just > > "callback". Since most major API providers already use "callback" to > > signify JSON-P callback, can we rename this to "callback_uri"? This > > will help avoid collisions and confusion. > > > > > > -Naitik > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
