On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:29 AM, John Jawed <johnja...@gmail.com> wrote: > JSON markup is lighter than XML markup.
Yes, but I don't think XML was an option anymore. The question is between: 1. application/x-www-form-urlencoded 2. application/x-www-form-urlencoded and JSON Marius > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Marius Scurtescu <mscurte...@google.com> > wrote: >> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Evan Gilbert <uid...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... and JSON only adds complexity and external >>> library requirements. >>> >>> I'm not positive we need to support JSON at all. >> >> Tend to agree. >> >> Other than being nice, what other advantages does JSON provide? >> >> Keep in mind that most people voted for one format only, and that is >> clearly not possible, at a minimum we have to support both >> application/x-www-form-urlencoded and JSON. >> >> Marius >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
