And have it become one of the official IETF Working Group documents though.


On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:37 PM, David Recordon <record...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I'd honestly write it as a standalone few page document. We really need to
> show that flows can be defined outside of the core spec from an
> extensibility standpoint.
>
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Nat Sakimura <sakim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I can do the XML2RFC thing as well.
>>
>> Shall I just make a section and upload the section somewhere?
>>
>> =nat
>>
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:37 PM, David Recordon <record...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > This feels exactly like the sort of thing that should be a new flow.
>> Nat,
>> > thanks for writing it up! I think the next step is getting it into the
>> > XML2RFC format and some editing.
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Manger, James H
>> > <james.h.man...@team.telstra.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Nat,
>> >>
>> >> This looks like a decent idea: allow one user-uri parameter to
>> reference a
>> >> larger set of user-uri parameters held elsewhere -- to avoid URI size
>> >> limits.
>> >>
>> >> Hopefully it can be specified as another user-uri parameter -- not as a
>> >> separate flow. It could be helpful for any of the delegation flows.
>> >>
>> >> [I think the spec would be improved with a dedicated section on the
>> >> user-uri (End-User endpoint) that lists all the parameters that it can
>> take
>> >> (that are defined in the spec) -- and explains each parameter (some
>> will
>> >> need their own sub-section). The per-flow sections would not repeat any
>> of
>> >> that: they could be a lot more succinct.]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Quick suggestion for text:
>> >>
>> >> [for section 3.2 "End-user Endpoint"]
>> >> ...
>> >> The following user-uri parameters are defined in this specification:
>> >> ...
>> >>  inc_uri   A URI for obtaining further parameters for this request.
>> >>
>> >> ...
>> >> <inc_uri> allows parameters for the user-uri request to be referenced,
>> >> instead of included directly. This is particularly helpful when the
>> >> parameters are large and might not fit within the URI length limits of
>> the
>> >> user's browser. The response to a GET request to <inc_uri> SHALL be
>> user-uri
>> >> parameters in XXX format. Any parameter appearing directly in the
>> user-uri
>> >> SHALL override the same parameter obtained from <inc_uri>. The
>> <inc_uri>
>> >> response SHOULD be cacheable by including appropriate HTTP
>> cache-control
>> >> headers. The <inc_uri> SHALL be an HTTP or HTTPS URI, and SHOULD be the
>> >> latter.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [Probably need a way for a service to indicate whether or not it
>> supports
>> >> <inc_uri>. Perhaps a "features=inc_uri,other" parameter in the HTTP
>> >> WWW-Authenticate header.]
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> James Manger
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>> >> Nat Sakimura
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2010 11:58 PM
>> >> To: oauth
>> >> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Mobile WebApp Flow
>> >>
>> >> Back in February, I have suggested mobile web app flow to the
>> oauth_wrap
>> >> group.
>> >> Now that it is wrapped into OAuth 2.0, here is my another try, this
>> >> time for OAuth 2.0 draft.
>> >>
>> >> "OAuth 2.0 Mobile WebApp Flow"
>> >>
>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/modules/wordpress/oauth-20-mobile-webapp-flow/
>> >>
>> >> I really wish that this could be included in OAuth 2.0 as it will help
>> >> build identity layers on OAuth 2.0 that works for mobile web browsers
>> etc.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
>> >> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
>> >> http://twitter.com/_nat_en
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> OAuth mailing list
>> >> OAuth@ietf.org
>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> OAuth mailing list
>> >> OAuth@ietf.org
>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
>> http://twitter.com/_nat_en
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to