Good point that version checking be clearly included in the spec.

On 2010-06-21, at 4:54 AM, Rob Richards wrote:

> I still think that the issue of running both 1.0 and 2.0 on an resource 
> endpoint needs to be addressed in the spec. It is unrealistic to think that a 
> provider currently running 1.0 can just do a complete cutover to 2.0 and shut 
> down 1.0 access, or providers arbitrarily making the decision what 
> constitutes 1.0 and what constitutes 2.0. Personally I think that an 
> oauth_version parameter should be required for the resource endpoint as it 
> will definitely allow version to be determined and prevent this potential 
> problem from any future versions as well. Others think that just by checking 
> for non-existance of parameters would work, though it is only best guess at 
> that point because it could be a 1.0 call requiring a 400 error to be 
> returned. In either case, this really needs to be addressed in the spec so 
> that all providers are doing the check in the exact same way to avoid 
> ambiguity.
> 
> Rob
> 
> Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
>> 
>> With the exception of extensibility, I consider draft -08 to be feature 
>> complete. This means that the draft contains all the features and components 
>> needed and other then editorial work is close to finished. I plan to finish 
>> work on the -09 draft by Mon or Tue next week which will include the 
>> extensibility text, additional editorial work, and resolution of the 
>> proposal to simplify the end-user authorization endpoint. At that point, I 
>> intend to ask for an interim last-call on the normative language (i.e. the 
>> implementation details).
>> 
>> Note that this last-call isn’t really a WG last call. The spec can change 
>> after that. But it will be a useful milestone to figure out if the draft’s 
>> implementation details are stable and can be considered complete.
>> 
>> All of this of course requires the approval of the chairs.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to