I guess my reply is similar to Marius. We haven't had a need for it yet in our production deployment.
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt < tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote: > David, > > any opinion on screen orientation and size? > > regards, > Torsten. > > Am 27.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Torsten Lodderstedt: > > If I understand your proposal correctly, you assume the clients knows > better than the authz server how to fit the client presentation capabilities > the best. > > Wouldn't it be neccessary to also tell the authz server the screen > orientation and available size? > > regards, > Torsten. > > Am 12.07.2010 21:51, schrieb David Recordon: > > I wrote this draft last month based on discussions on the mailing list, the > OpenID user experience extension (which Facebook, Google, and Yahoo! have > deployed), and some OAuth 2.0 implementation experience from Facebook. It > defines language and display preferences which the client can include in > requests to the end-user authorization endpoint. > > A previous draft included an immediate mode parameter but further > discussion has shown that it should be removed until identity information is > also addressed. Identity is outside the scope of this particular extension. > > I'd like this draft to become a working group document and have done my > best to make it represent the group's consensus. Unfortunately the internet > draft submission process is closed for a few weeks until after the meeting. > :-\ > > Thanks, > --David > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing listoa...@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing listoa...@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
