Why aren't these published as an IETF I-D? EHL
On 9/23/10 5:40 PM, "Mike Jones" <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> wrote: FYI, I've also posted this at http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-goland-json-web-token-00.html and http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-goland-json-web-token-00.xml for easy reference by those who didn't receive the original attachments. -- Mike From: Mike Jones Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:22 PM To: 'oauth@ietf.org' Cc: Yaron Goland Subject: JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft Recognizing that there is substantial interest in representing sets of claims in JSON tokens, Yaron Goland and I have put together a draft JSON Web Token (JWT) spec for that purpose. To answer the obvious question, while this was produced independently of Dirk's JSON token proposal <http://balfanz.github.com/jsontoken-spec/draft-balfanz-jsontoken-00.html> , both of us agree that we should come up with a unified spec. Consider this an additional point in the possible design space from which to start discussions and drive consensus. (If you read the two proposals, I think you'll find that there's already a lot in common, which is great.) Thanks to those of you who have already given us feedback to improve the draft prior to this point. Cheers, -- Mike
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
