The goal is to have a single unified draft.

From: David Recordon [mailto:record...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 7:00 AM
To: Nat Sakimura; Yaron Goland
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00

I'm a bit confused between the relationship of Nat's I-D and the documents you 
and Mike recently posted. Is the goal to have one I-D? Nat's seems to have 
fewer options and different modes which makes it easier to read and understand.

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Yaron Goland 
<yar...@microsoft.com<mailto:yar...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
BTW, Nat and I, as mentioned below, are talking. Here is my current draft. 
Please keep in mind that it's really just a set of notes trying to capture all 
the issues involved in creating a secure token format so it's a bit dense. My 
hope is that once all the issues are captured it can be completely re-written 
to be in something that looks more like English and is easier for actual 
implementers to follow. But for now I think it gives a good sense of the some 
of the security challenges in creating a secure token format.
                Yaron

From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org> 
[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Nat 
Sakimura
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:50 AM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00

Hi.

It has been a few weeks since then I volunteered to do this work.
I have written up to this pre 00 draft then have been doing some reality checks 
on some script languages etc.

No. This pre-00 draft is far from being feature complete.
I still need to copy and paste the Magic Signatures text etc.
Also, I should add how this spec is being used in some of the major flows.

However, since I will not be able to work on it this week, I thought it would 
be worthwhile to share this early draft so that you have some clarity into the 
progress.

Apparently, Yaron has been working on it as well. We will compare the notes and 
try to merge, I hope.

So, here it is!

#For those of you who have seen the private draft, it has not been changed 
since July 31.

Best,

=nat



_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to