Future revisions of this SAML draft will build off whatever assertion/extension mechanism is provided by the core framework spec. However, some compelling reasons were previously given for keeping the 'assertion' (one thread on the topic: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04401.html) parameter in core. Has the thinking on that changed?
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt <tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote: > +1 > > > > Am 14.12.2010 um 04:19 schrieb Eran Hammer-Lahav <e...@hueniverse.com>: > >> I think the 'assertion' parameter should be moved into this draft and >> defined there. This will also facilitate its proper definition and status >> (required, singular, etc.). >> >> EHL >> _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
