On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> wrote: > I’d like a sense from the working group whether others want this change, and > if so, what the name should be changed to.
Probably this was debated, but I will ask again. Why can't we use "OAuth2" as the scheme in all cases and require a token_type name/value pair? Is it wise to dump lots of new schemes in a name space we do not control? Marius _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
