On the security aspect: I will write a short text for the OAuth draft because 
the longer writeup by Torsten/Mar/Phil is targeting a different scope. So, you 
cannot just copy it. 

On Mar 27, 2011, at 12:36 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

> The security consideration section pending, this is the last open issue I 
> have to close as editor before the document is ready to leave the working 
> group. While this is silly business for many, it is very important to others, 
> so bear with me. I want to make sure we give everyone the proper recognition 
> they deserve.
>  
> - Authors
>  
> The document currently lists 1 editor (Eran Hammer-Lahav) and 2 authors 
> (David Recordon, Dick Hardt). The three names were originally selected to 
> reflect the compromise edited by David, combining the two document (OAuth 1.0 
> RFC and WRAP I-D) edited by Dick and me. I am about to include a large chuck 
> of work written by Torsten Lodderstedt, Mark McGloin, and Phil Hunt.
>  
> This raises the question of who should receive top billing. These are the 
> options I came up with (listed without any preference):
>  
> - Leave the three names as in -13.
> - Add the three additional names and obtain a special exception from the 
> IESG/AD (?) for listing more than 5 names (RFC rules).
> - List only the editor (IETF norm).
> - Some other criteria to show a different subset of names.
>  
> Any of the above can be combined with moving the Contributors section to the 
> front (before the introduction) to give higher visibility to the 
> contributors. I honestly have no preference and given that my name is listed 
> as editor in the 3 alternatives, I will refrain from expressing an opinion.
>  
>  
> - Contributors
>  
> The following is the new Contributors appendix:
>  
> Appendix A.  Contributors
>  
>    This specification is the work of the OAuth Working Group which
>    includes dozens of active and dedicated participants.  In particular,
>    the following individuals contributed ideas, feedback, and wording
>    which shaped and formed the final specification:
>  
>    Michael Adams, Andrew Arnott, Dirk Balfanz, Blaine Cook, Brian
>    Campbell, Leah Culver, Bill de hOra, Brian Eaton, Brian Ellin, Igor
>    Faynberg, George Fletcher, Tim Freeman, Evan Gilbert, Yaron Goland,
>    Brent Goldman, Kristoffer Gronowski, Justin Hart, Craig Heath, Phil
>    Hunt, Michael B. Jones, John Kemp, Mark Kent, Raffi Krikorian, Chasen
>    Le Hara, Rasmus Lerdorf, Torsten Lodderstedt, Hui-Lan Lu, Paul
>    Madsen, Alastair Mair, Eve Maler, James Manger, Laurence Miao, Chuck
>    Mortimore, Justin Richer, Peter Saint-Andre, Nat Sakimura, Rob Sayre,
>    Marius Scurtescu, Naitik Shah, Luke Shepard, Justin Smith, Jeremy
>    Suriel, Christian Stuebner, Paul Tarjan, Allen Tom, Franklin Tse,
>    Nick Walker, Skylar Woodward.
>  
>    The initial OAuth 2.0 protocol specification was edited by David
>    Recordon, based on two previous publications: the OAuth 1.0 community
>    specification [RFC5849], and OAuth WRAP (OAuth Web Resource
>    Authorization Profiles) [I-D.draft-hardt-oauth-01].
>  
>    The OAuth 1.0 community specification was edited by Eran Hammer-Lahav
>    and authored by Mark Atwood, Dirk Balfanz, Darren Bounds, Richard M.
>    Conlan, Blaine Cook, Leah Culver, Breno de Medeiros, Brian Eaton,
>    Kellan Elliott-McCrea, Larry Halff, Eran Hammer-Lahav, Ben Laurie,
>    Chris Messina, John Panzer, Sam Quigley, David Recordon, Eran
>    Sandler, Jonathan Sergent, Todd Sieling, Brian Slesinsky, and Andy
>    Smith.
>  
>    The OAuth WRAP specification was edited by Dick Hardt and authored by
>    Brian Eaton, Yaron Goland, Dick Hardt, and Allen Tom.
>  
> The list of names was directly derived from my issues list from the past 
> year. During every document edit I kept track of the person providing the 
> feedback which resulted in a change. This means that those participating in 
> discussions but who did not directly have any impact on the document are not 
> named. This is the only reasonable criteria I was able to come up with.
>  
> An alternative is to list anyone who posted anything to the mailing list 
> since the work began or to keep the list as-is and let the chairs hand-pick 
> any additional names they believe are justified. I don’t have strong views, 
> as long as the list is fair.
>  
>  
> - Acknowledgement
>  
> This section will start with ‘The editor wishes to thank…’ and is at my 
> discretion.
>  
> EHL
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to