On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Anthony Nadalin <tony...@microsoft.com> wrote: > That's nice, four people come up with text and you decide to use your text. > Making state optional does nothing to fix the protocol issue, people will get > this wrong and have. Our developers have been through this and agreed > upon the text that was generated. They find the text in the current draft > unacceptable and confusing and think that new text is acceptable.
I have to agree with what Tony says above. The text proposed in his message was agreed upon by several WG participants, and unless there's some significant objection to it I think we should use it in the -21 version, subject to final WG review. Barry, as chair _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
