All I agree with is to limit the scope character-set in the v2 spec to the 
subset of ASCII allowed in HTTP header quoted-string, excluding " and \ so no 
escaping is needed, ever.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 8:25 AM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; John Bradley; Richer, Justin P.; OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-09: Open Issues &
> Proposed Resolutions
> 
> It is good that we have an agreement among a few people that more text
> needs to be provided in the core specification on the issue of the scope
> element.
> 
> Now, there is still the question of what the text should say. The questions
> from my earlier mails are therefore still applicable and need an answer.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> On Oct 17, 2011, at 7:27 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> 
> > I agree.
> >
> > EHL
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: John Bradley [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 6:07 AM
> >> To: Richer, Justin P.
> >> Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; OAuth WG
> >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-09: Open Issues &
> >> Proposed Resolutions
> >>
> >> The scopes cross all of the profiles.
> >>
> >> I expect that restricting the character sets for bearer tokens, MAC,
> >> and other future variants should be dealt with in those profiles.
> >>
> >> Without restricting scope in core, we leave the possibility of coming
> >> up with different rules in different profiles e.g. MAC vs Bearer.
> >>
> >> It is probably best to have one rule in core that works across all the
> profiles.
> >>
> >> John B.
> >> On 2011-10-16, at 7:19 PM, Richer, Justin P. wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think the limit makes sense, but then are tokens limited by the
> >>> same
> >> rules? They need to live in all the same places (query parameters,
> >> headers,
> >> forms) that scopes do and would be subject to the same kinds of
> >> encoding woes that scopes will. Or am I missing something obvious as
> >> to why this isn't a problem for tokens (both bearer tokens and the
> >> public part of MAC tokens) but is a problem for scope strings?
> >>>
> >>> -- Justin
> >>> ________________________________________
> >>> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of
> >>> John Bradley [[email protected]]
> >>> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 8:11 PM
> >>> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> >>> Cc: OAuth WG
> >>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-09: Open Issues &
> >> Proposed Resolutions
> >>>
> >>> Restricting it now in the core spec is going to save a lot of headaches
> later.
> >>>
> >>> John B.
> >>> On 2011-10-16, at 3:54 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It's an open question for the list.
> >>>>
> >>>> EHL
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2011 11:00 AM
> >>>>> To: Mike Jones
> >>>>> Cc: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo); Hannes Tschofenig; OAuth
> >>>>> WG; Eran Hammer-Lahav
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-09: Open Issues
> >>>>> & Proposed Resolutions
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2011-10-16 18:44, Mike Jones wrote:
> >>>>>> As Eran wrote on 9/30, "The fact that the v2 spec allows a wide
> >>>>>> range of
> >>>>> characters in scope was unintentional. The design was limited to
> >>>>> allow simple ASCII strings and URIs."
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see. Thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is this going to be clarified in -23?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards, Julian
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> OAuth mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OAuth mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OAuth mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to