Hi Mike,
On 03/08/2012 03:31 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I wanted to verify that, despite this state change, that it's still OK for me
to make the editorial change suggested by the WG to the Bearer spec to change
the b64token example.
Sure. Changes the WG want that don't conflict with anything hammered
out in WGLC or IETF LC between now and about a week before the IESG
telechat (i.e. ~April 5th) are fine IMO but best to be guided by the
WG chairs - in this case I don't recall the change you mean but I bet
the WG chairs do.
In other words, just check with the chairs before posting new revs
is a good plan from now on.
Cheers,
S.
Thanks,
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 3:07 AM
To: oauth-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bea...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice:<draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-17.txt>
State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead ID Tracker URL:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer/
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
