Hi Blaine, 

These are indeed good requirements you stated below. 

When you look at the list of topics do you think that the proposed items indeed 
fulfill them? 

Ciao
Hannes


> -----Original Message-----
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of ext Blaine Cook
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:31 PM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
> 
> On 14 March 2012 20:21, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net>
> wrote:
> > So, here is a proposal:
> >
> > [Editor's Note: New work for the group. 5 items maximum! ]
> >
> > Aug. 2012    Submit 'Token Revocation' to the IESG for consideration
> as a Proposed Standard
> > Nov. 2012    Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT)' to the IESG for
> consideration as a Proposed Standard
> > Nov. 2012    Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for
> OAuth 2.0' to the IESG for consideration
> > Jan. 2013    Submit 'OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol' to
> the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard
> > Sep. 2012    Submit 'OAuth Use Cases' to the IESG for consideration
> as an Informational RFC
> 
> This looks great to me.
> 
> I have serious concerns about feature-creep, and think that the OAuth
> WG should strongly limit its purview to these issues. In general, I
> think it prudent for this working group in particular to consider
> standardisation of work only under the following criteria:
> 
> 1. Proposals must have a direct relationship to the mechanism of OAuth
> (and not, specifically, bound to an application-level protocol).
> 2. Proposals must have significant adoption in both enterprise and
> startup environments.
> 3. Any proposal must be driven based on a consideration of the
> different approaches, as adopted in the wild, and strive to be a
> better synthesis of those approaches, not a means to an end.
> 
> These are the constraints with which I started the OAuth project, and
> they're more relevant than ever. I'd hate to see OAuth fail in the end
> because of a WS-*-like death by standards-pile-on.
> 
> b.
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to