During the IESG review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2, Sean Turner raised the following DISCUSS item (meaning, the specification is blocked until this is resolved):
> 0) General: I found the lack of ABNF somewhat disconcerting in that > implementers would have to hunt through the spec to figure out all the > values of a given field. For example grant_type has different values based > on the different kind of access_token requests - four to be more precise - > but there's no ABNF for the field. There are many examples of > this. It would greatly aid implementers if a) the ABNF for all fields > were included in the draft and b) all the ABNF was collected in one place. I > had individual discusses for each field that had missing ABNF, but it was > getting out of hand so I'm just going to do this one general discuss on this > topic. I don't have the time to prepare such text. Can someone volunteer to submit this text to the WG for review? EH
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
