Quick question: Why is it “association request”, not “registration request”? Nearly everywhere the term “association” appears, it seems like you could insert “registration” and achieve better clarity. -T
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Richer, Justin P. <jric...@mitre.org> wrote: > This draft combines the best-usable parts UMA and OpenID Connect dynamic > registration drafts into one document that's designed to facilitate dynamic > client registration. I've significantly reorganized the document and I've > tried to exorcise any obvious dependencies on OpenID Connect or UMA. This > protocol follows the OpenID Connect registration model most closely, in > that it's form-parameters in and JSON out (as opposed to JSON round trip). > This matches the rest of the OAuth protocol. It's a push model only for > metadata as well, but it allows clients to push updates. > > General formatting is still rough, but I think that the text is mostly > readable and complete. There are several Editor's Notes in the document > that bring up what I consider to be open questions or issues with the > functionality. One that I forgot to leave a note for is client > unregistration. Does it make sense to provide mechanisms for a full > lifecycle for well-behaved clients? > > We'll be discussing this draft in person at the IETF meeting for the OAuth > working group on Thursday for anybody who wants to throw tomatoes at me*. > > -- Justin > > > *Please do not actually throw tomatoes at me. > > ________________________________________ > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [oauth-boun...@ietf.org] on behalf of > internet-dra...@ietf.org [internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 5:12 PM > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-01.txt > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group > of the IETF. > > Title : OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol > Author(s) : Justin Richer > Thomas Hardjono > Maciej Machulak > Eve Maler > Christian Scholz > Nat Sakimura > John Bradley > Michael B. Jones > Filename : draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-01.txt > Pages : 20 > Date : 2012-11-05 > > Abstract: > This specification proposes an OAuth Dynamic Client Registration > protocol. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-01 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-01 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
