+1 for the references
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> wrote: > BTW, the SAML purists would probably point out that I should have written > “SAML 2.0 assertions” – not “SAML 2.0 tokens” below. J > > > > From: Justin Richer [mailto:jric...@mitre.org] > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 1:42 PM > To: Mike Jones > Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Additional informative references for Assertions > draft > > > > +1, cross references are a good thing when documents are split up. > > On 12/19/2012 04:33 PM, Mike Jones wrote: > > I’d suggest adding informative references to the OAuth SAML and JWT Profile > documents in the Assertions draft. After this sentence of the Introduction: > > > > In order to be implementable, companion specifications are necessary to > provide the corresponding concrete instantiations. > > > > I’d add the following: > > > > For instance, the SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 > [draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer] defines a concrete instantiation for SAML > 2.0 tokens and JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0 > [draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer] defines a concrete instantiation for JWT > tokens. > > > > Doing that will help readers find the concrete instances from the abstract > specification. > > > > Thanks, > > -- Mike > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
