On 02/28/2013 10:57 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > This is certainly a good point. Stating whether certain claims are > valid or not valid is not a good use of our time and may lead to legal > problems later on. > > So, read through the patents and make your own assessment whether this > IPRs are a concern for you and whether you want anything in the drafts > to be changed. > good point. thx _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] Fw: IPR Disclosure: - What to Do with JWT ? Oleg Gryb
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fw: IPR Disclosure: - What to Do wi... Leif Johansson
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fw: IPR Disclosure: - What to Do wi... Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fw: IPR Disclosure: - What to D... prateek mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fw: IPR Disclosure: - What ... Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fw: IPR Disclosure: - W... Leif Johansson
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fw: IPR Disclosure: - What ... Oleg Gryb
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fw: IPR Disclosure: - What ... Mike Jones
- [OAUTH-WG] comment on draft-tschofenig-auth-aud... prateek mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] comment on draft-tschofenig-... Hannes Tschofenig
- [OAUTH-WG] the meaning of audience in S... prateek mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] the meaning of audi... Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] the meaning of ... Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] the meaning... prateek mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] the meaning... Chuck Mortimore