While a JWT might generically have many different audiences like resource 
servers, this profile is about sending it to the token endpoint at an AS for 
authentication or authorization.

I think adding something about the RS will confuse people.   

I think Brian's text is fine.

John B.

On Jul 18, 2014, at 11:45 PM, Phil Hunt <phil.h...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Should that be encrypted for the intended audience (aud) of the JWT which may 
> be the AS and/or the resource server?
> 
> Phil
> 
> On Jul 18, 2014, at 21:52, Brian Campbell <bcampb...@pingidentity.com> wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for the slow response on this Kathleen, my day job has been keeping me 
>> busy recently. And, honestly, I was kind of hopeful someone would volunteer 
>> some text in the meantime. But that didn't happen so how about the following?
>> 
>> A JWT may contain privacy-sensitive information and, to prevent disclosure 
>> of such information to unintended parties, should only be transmitted over 
>> encrypted channels, such as TLS. In cases where it’s desirable to prevent 
>> disclosure of certain information the client, the JWT may be be encrypted to 
>> the authorization server. 
>> 
>> Deployments should determine the minimum amount of information necessary to 
>> complete the exchange and include only such claims in the JWT. In some cases 
>> the "sub" (subject) claim can be a value representing an anonymous or 
>> pseudonymous user as described in Section 6.3.1 of the Assertion Framework 
>> for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants 
>> [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-16#section-6.3.1].
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Kathleen Moriarty 
>> <kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I just read through draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-09 and it looks good.  The 
>> only question/comment I have is that I don't see any mention of privacy 
>> considerations in the referenced security sections.  COuld you add 
>> something?  It is easily addressed by section 10.8 of RFC6749, but there is 
>> no mention of privacy considerations.  I'm sure folks could generate great 
>> stories about who accessing what causing privacy considerations to be 
>> important.
>> 
>> Thanks & have a nice weekend!
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Kathleen
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to