Is "experimental" the correct classification? Maybe "informational" is more appropriate as both of these were discussed.
-----Original Message----- From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:50 PM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol: Next Steps? Hi all, in response to the discussions at the last IETF meeting the authors of the "Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol" http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management-05 have changed the document type to "Experimental". We need to make a decision about the next steps for the document and we see the following options: a) Publish it as an experimental RFC b) Remove it from the working group and ask an AD to shepherd it c) Remove it from the working group and let the authors publish it via the independent submission track. In any case it would be nice to let folks play around with it and then, after some time, come back to determine whether there is enough interest to produce a standard. Please let us know what you think! Ciao Hannes & Derek _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
