The OAuth meeting is today. We ran into the publication deadline for the IETF meeting during IIW so haven't published a update yet.
We do have text on defining error codes that we will discuss today. I expect the name discussion will also happen today. Changing the draft name is annoying for document tracker continuity but doable. John B. On Nov 12, 2014, at 6:56 AM, Brian Campbell <bcampb...@pingidentity.com> wrote: > I agree that changing the name could avoid a lot of unnecessary confusion > (and said as much in Sept > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg13361.html). > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Bill Mills <wmills_92...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Any progress on naming on this thing? Didn't see any reply to my previous > comment, but that might have been because I replied to the -02 publication > notice and it might have gotten filtered. > > Similarly, the question of extending the error registry to allow the server > tofeed back a failure if the server's required hash method isn't sent. Also > may need a way to advertise what hash method is required. > > Regards, > > -bill > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
