Would not kid do?
Right, thumbprint has more semantics and has nice properties, but having
too many ways is not good for interop.

Nat

2015-03-23 15:40 GMT+09:00 Brian Campbell <bcampb...@pingidentity.com>:

> Do folks in the WG think there'd be utility in having a way to identity
> the finger/thumbprint of a key in the cnf claim. A presenter might, for
> example, present the JWT along with a public JWK and some
> proof-of-possession of that JWK.  And the JWK would be bound to the JWT via
> the thumbprint, which is more space efficient (with respect to the JWT
> anyway) than the full JWK.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to