Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs draft -04 addresses the remaining 
working group comments received - both a few leftover WGLC comments and 
comments received during IETF 93 in Prague<http://www.ietf.org/meeting/93/>.  
The changes were:

*         Allowed the use of "jwk" for symmetric keys when the JWT is encrypted.

*         Added the "jku" (JWK Set URL) member.

*         Added privacy considerations.

*         Reordered sections so that the "cnf" (confirmation) claim is defined 
before it is used.

*         Noted that applications can define new claim names, in addition to 
"cnf", to represent additional proof-of-possession keys, using the same 
representation as "cnf".

*         Applied wording clarifications suggested by Nat Sakimura.

The updated specification is available at:

*         https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-04

An HTML formatted version is also available at:

*         
http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-04.html

                                                                -- Mike

P.S.  This note was also published at http://self-issued.info/?p=1442 and as 
@selfissued<https://twitter.com/selfissued>.

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to