The word authorization is implied by OAuth, consider "OAuth 2.0 JWT Request".
-- Jim Manico @Manicode (808) 652-3805 > On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:43 AM, Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi OAuthers: > > One of the to do for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-05 > is to come up with a better title. > The current title “OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request (JAR)”, is somewhat > better than what it used to be, but if you can suggest a better name, I am > all for it. > > Please let me know if you have an idea. > > Best, > -- > Nat Sakimura <[email protected]> > Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. > > PLEASE READ: > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the > named recipient(s) only. > If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified > that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this message > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please > notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
