+1

Phil

> On Dec 17, 2015, at 15:00, tors...@lodderstedt.net wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> the report is correct. Please consider it an errata to RFC 6819.
> 
> kind regards,
> Torsten.
> 
> Am 08.12.2015 16:05, schrieb RFC Errata System:
>> The following errata report has been held for document update
>> for RFC6819, "OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations".
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6819&eid=4267
>> --------------------------------------
>> Status: Held for Document Update
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: David Gladstone <david.gladst...@nib.co.nz>
>> Date Reported: 2015-02-09
>> Held by: Kathleen Moriarty (IESG)
>> Section: 4.4.1.11
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> If an authorization server includes a nontrivial amount of entropy
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> If an authorization server includes a trivial amount of entropy
>> Notes
>> -----
>> The threat being described outlines a scenario where too little
>> entropy is involved; countermeasures include using non-trivial amounts
>> of entropy.
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC6819 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel-08)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations
>> Publication Date    : January 2013
>> Author(s)           : T. Lodderstedt, Ed., M. McGloin, P. Hunt
>> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
>> Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
>> Area                : Security
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to