Yes sorry. code_challenge_method is the query parameter so code_challenge_methods_supported
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 6:12 PM, William Denniss <wdenn...@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 6:17 AM, John Bradley <ve7...@ve7jtb.com > <mailto:ve7...@ve7jtb.com>> wrote: > The code_challenge and code_challenge_method parameter names predate calling > the spec PKCE. > > Given that some of us deployed early versions of PKCE in products and > opensource to mitigate the problem before the spec was completed we decided > not to rename the parameter names from code_verifier_method to > pkce_verifier_method. > > For consistency we should stick with code_verifier_methods_supported in > discovery. > > To clarify, did you mean "code_challenge_methods_supported"? That is, > building on the param name "code_challenge_method" from Section 4.3 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636#section-4.3>? > > > John B. > >> On Jan 21, 2016, at 3:12 AM, William Denniss <wdenn...@google.com >> <mailto:wdenn...@google.com>> wrote: >> >> "code_challenge_methods_supported" definitely works for me. >> >> Any objections to moving forward with that? I would like to update our >> discovery doc shortly. >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Nat Sakimura <sakim...@gmail.com >> <mailto:sakim...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Ah, OK. That's actually reasonable. >> >> 2016年1月21日(木) 9:31 nov matake <mat...@gmail.com <mailto:mat...@gmail.com>>: >> I prefer “code_challenge_methods_supported”, since the registered parameter >> name is “code_challenge_method”, not “pkce_method". >> >>> On Jan 19, 2016, at 11:58, William Denniss <wdenn...@google.com >>> <mailto:wdenn...@google.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Seems like we agree this should be added. How should it look? >>> >>> Two ideas: >>> >>> "code_challenge_methods_supported": ["plain", "S256"] >>> >>> or >>> >>> "pkce_methods_supported": ["plain", "S256"] >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt >>> <tors...@lodderstedt.net <mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net>> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> Am 06.01.2016 um 18:25 schrieb William Denniss: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 6:40 AM, John Bradley <ve7...@ve7jtb.com >>>> <mailto:ve7...@ve7jtb.com>> wrote: >>>> Good point. Now that PKCE is a RFC we should add it to discovery. >>>> >>>> John B. >>>> > On Jan 6, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladi...@connect2id.com >>>> > <mailto:vladi...@connect2id.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > I just noticed PKCE support is missing from the discovery metadata. >>>> > >>>> > Is it a good idea to add it? >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > >>>> > Vladimir >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Vladimir Dzhuvinov >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > OAuth mailing list >>>> > OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> >>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>>> > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OAuth mailing list >>>> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OAuth mailing list >>>> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth> > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
