To my knowledge, it's been replaced with RFC 8252. See https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2InstalledApp (notice the deprecation notices in options 3 and 4 in the "create authorization credentials" section; you can find the "oob" URN later in the doc, associated with the same options)
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:23 PM Jim Willeke <j...@willeke.com> wrote: > Wondering if you could help with Questions on urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob as > it appears to be an almost common usage, but no IETF documentation or > registration that we can find on the defined usage. > > This has come up on several occasions. > > - https://stackoverflow.com/q/46643795/88122 > - http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/2014-May/001814.html > - https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/514 > - https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09974.html > > > Should it be registered or defined? > (or am I missing something?) > > With best regards, > > -- > -jim > Jim Willeke > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
