Resurrecting the thread that had a request for more guidance around how to
use the explicit typing with nested JWTs. As discussed/requested during the
WG meeting.

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Good point.  I’d had that thought as well at one point but failed to
> express it in the draft.  Will do.
>
>
>
>                                                        -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Campbell [mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 17, 2017 11:53 AM
> *To:* Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.h...@oracle.com>
> *Cc:* Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>; oauth@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token Best Current Practices draft
> describing Explicit Typing
>
>
>
> Could some more guidance be provided around how to use the explicit typing
> with nested JWTs?
>
> I'd imagine that the "typ" header should be in the header of the JWT that
> is integrity protected by the issuer?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:58 PM, Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.h...@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> Thanks Mike.
>
> Phil
>
>
> On Jul 4, 2017, at 12:43 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> The JWT BCP draft has been updated to describe the use of explicit typing
> of JWTs as one of the ways to prevent confusion among different kinds of
> JWTs.  This is accomplished by including an explicit type for the JWT in
> the “typ” header parameter.  For instance, the Security Event Token (SET)
> specification <http://self-issued.info/?p=1709> now uses the “
> application/secevent+jwt” content type to explicitly type SETs.
>
>
>
> The specification is available at:
>
>    - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheffer-oauth-jwt-bcp-01
>
>
>
> An HTML-formatted version is also available at:
>
>    - http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-sheffer-oauth-jwt-bcp-01.html
>
>
>
>                                                        -- Mike
>
>
>
> P.S.  This notice was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1714 and
> as @selfissued <https://twitter.com/selfissued>.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from
> your computer. Thank you.*
>

-- 
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you.*
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to