Hi Jan, Please note that this errata report has been removed. As stated at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php:
"Errata are for the RFCs as available from rfc-editor.org." We have sent separate mail regarding this error to webmas...@tools.ietf.org. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On Jul 5, 2019, at 6:56 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8252, > "OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5776 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Jan Dziekan <dziekan....@gmail.com> > > Section: GLOBAL > > Original Text > ------------- > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > > > Notes > ----- > RFC8252 references specific Sections of RFC6749, however urls are pointing to > Sections in RFC8252. > For example, in Section 6 there is a statement "code grant type per Section > 4.1 of OAuth 2.0 [RFC6749]", where "Section 4.1" links to > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8252#section-4.1 instead of > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1 > I have found such misplaced links in the following sections: 6, 8.2, 8.4, > 8.5, 8.6, 8.12 > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8252 (draft-ietf-oauth-native-apps-12) > -------------------------------------- > Title : OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps > Publication Date : October 2017 > Author(s) : W. Denniss, J. Bradley > Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE > Source : Web Authorization Protocol > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
