On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:05:57AM -0600, Brian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:31 AM Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> wrote: > > > >> — Section 6 — > > >> Should “TLS” here have a citation and normative reference? > > > > > > I didn't include an explicit reference here because TLS is transitively > > referenced by other > > > normative references (including 6749 of which this whole thing is an > > extension) and TLS > > > is pretty widely recognized even without citation. > > ... > > > I'm happy to add a citation here but it does raise the question of what > > the most appropriate > > > way to cite TLS is right now - 1.3, 1.2, or the BCP or some combination > > thereof? > > > > I wondered the same thing, and you're also right that it might not > > need a reference in this document. I only even flagged it because > > it's the subject of a MUST. I'll leave it to the Sec ADs (who > > obviously didn't flag it themselves, so maybe they agree that it's not > > necessary). > > > > I'm gonna just leave it as-is then, unless I hear otherwise from the Sec > ADs.
I'll throw it out there that "TLS" is marked as "well-known" at https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt ... -Ben _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
