Thanks Vincent, I've fixed the nit in the source controlled editor's xml version and it'll show up in the next draft revision.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 3:06 PM Vincent Roca via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Vincent Roca > Review result: Ready > > Hello, > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area > directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > Summary: Ready > > The Security considerations and privacy considerations sections both look > sound > to me. > > Nits: > * section 7.1: s/to which they where issued/to which they were issued/ > > Cheers. Vincent > > > > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
