The new text is clearly the right thing, and there is no need to debate it if/when the document gets updated. "Don't hold it; do it now", so to speak -- and noting that (my understanding/recollection of) the plan for https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc7800.html is that only verified errata, not those in other states, will be displayed.
(Yes, that link 404s at the moment, I assume a caching issue.) -Ben On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 10:55:01PM -0500, Pete Resnick wrote: > "Verified", not "Hold For Document Update"? > > pr > > On 30 May 2020, at 20:34, RFC Errata System wrote: > > > The following errata report has been verified for RFC7800, > > "Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JSON Web Tokens (JWTs)". > > > > -------------------------------------- > > You may review the report below and at: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6187 > > > > -------------------------------------- > > Status: Verified > > Type: Editorial > > > > Reported by: Pete Resnick <resn...@episteme.net> > > Date Reported: 2020-05-26 > > Verified by: Benjamin Kaduk (IESG) > > > > Section: 7.1 > > > > Original Text > > ------------- > > [JWK] Jones, M., "JSON Web Key (JWK)", RFC 7517, > > DOI 10.17487/RFC7157, May 2015, > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7517>. > > > > > > Corrected Text > > -------------- > > [JWK] Jones, M., "JSON Web Key (JWK)", RFC 7517, > > DOI 10.17487/RFC7517, May 2015, > > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7517>. > > > > > > Notes > > ----- > > DOI has a typo: 7157 instead of 7517. > > > > -------------------------------------- > > RFC7800 (draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-11) > > -------------------------------------- > > Title : Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JSON Web > > Tokens (JWTs) > > Publication Date : April 2016 > > Author(s) : M. Jones, J. Bradley, H. Tschofenig > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > Source : Web Authorization Protocol > > Area : Security > > Stream : IETF > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > -- > Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ > All connections to the world are tenuous at best _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
