On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 09:21:45AM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: > --VERIFIER NOTES-- > Errata reports are for reporting issues with the authoritative RFC version(s) > as published by the RFC Editor. RFC 8176 predates the usage of the "v3 XML" > format, so the plain text version is the authoritative one, and thus > questions of HTML links are irrelevant for it.
For what it's worth, this "bad HTML link" situation occurs with some regularity -- the "html" versions of non-v3-XML RFCs are created by running a script over the text version. The script uses heuristics to convert certain types of text into links, and "Section <N>" gets expanded to this document unless followed by "of RFC <Y>". I believe this script is open-source and patches would be welcome, though I don't know the location of the source-code repository in question off the top of my head. -Ben _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
