On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:30 AM Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org> wrote: > Hi! > > > > *From:* ietf <ietf-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Bron Gondwana > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2021 7:47 AM > *To:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* i...@ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021, at 23:40, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > > So you have never reached out to us to try to bring any work to the WG, > and based on attending one meeting and hearing from a few people, you > formed a strong opinion and declared that "nothing would get done"? that > seems odd. > > > > Based on a few meetings, and having heard from many people. > > > > For your information, last year we published 4 RFCs, and we already have 3 > documents with the IESG and more to come. > > > > That's good to hear. > > > > [Roman] In addition to regular cadence of proposed standard publications > noted above, I would additionally note that all of these documents came > with a model behavior of multiple implementations by WGLC – typically 3+. > The WG has not only managed to steadily complete its work items in the IETF > but also interest an implementor community to ensure this work is used. >
And way back when I was AD, OAuth was by far the most productive working group I managed. They put out what felt like about 3 documents a meeting for full publication. I was the AD for 3 years, ending in 2017 when EKR became an AD. There was a bit of management as a result of the number of experts and varying use cases for their environments, but even with that, OAuth was very productive. Since your document was 2016, I was likely the AD. Yes, the meetings had challenges at times, but we worked through it and things got done. Best regards, Kathleen > > Regards, > > Roman > > > -- Best regards, Kathleen
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
