Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-par-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-par/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. I can only regret that the document shepherd write-up does not include anything about the WG consensus. Please find below one non-blocking COMMENT points (no need to reply), and some nits. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 1 -- "traditional web applications but is prohibitively difficult to use with mobile apps", I find the adverb "prohibitively" possibly slightly exagerated ;-) == NITS == Is this "user-agent" or "user agent" ? As it is not about the HTTP header. The PAR acronym for "pushed authorization requests" is defined but nearly never used in the text. -- Section 1 -- The first § is a single very long sentence. Consider splitting this long sentence in shorter ones ? Same applies in other places in the document (e.g., 1st sentence in section 2.4) _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
