I support the adoption of this document, it seems like a good starting point for defining the link between HTTP Signatures and OAuth.
Aaron On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:18 AM Justin Richer <jric...@mit.edu> wrote: > Needless to say, but as the author of both this draft and the draft that > it would replace, I am in favor of adoption of this document. There are > still a lot of open questions to answer — such as key introduction and > management practices — and I think there is a lot of power in the > intersection of the OAuth and HTTPSig spaces. > > — Justin > > On Jul 16, 2021, at 12:31 PM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > All, > > This is a call for adoption for the *OAuth Proof of Possession Tokens > with HTTP Message Signatures* draft as a WG document: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richer-oauth-httpsig/ > > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list *by July 30th*. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
