Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-rar-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-rar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work on this document. Many thanks to Thomas Fossati for his ART ART review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/EckO_3zF-gnI83Q_HmO5xREursI/ and thanks to the authors for addressing Thomas' comments. No other comments from me, just a note: I was wondering if it wouldn't have made sense to informally reference and discuss in a short paragraph RFC9237 and its applicability to OAuth given its content - I will accept that it might not be the case since 9237 is really intended for Ace and IoT but the similarities made me question it. Francesca _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
