Thanks Justin, It'll be fixed in the next draft revision. I happened to notice the oversight as well when working on the AD review and have already added it in the document source in github.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 3:44 PM Justin Richer <jric...@mit.edu> wrote: > DPoP Authors: > > I just noticed that the DPoP-Nonce header is not registered in the current > version of the DPoP spec. This should be added under section 12.8, HTTP > Message Header Field Names Registration. It’s a clerical oversight but > needs to be fixed before the document is finalized. > > — Justin > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
