Thanks for reviewing the specification, Paul.
The authors agree it is too late in the game to change the name of "nonce".
FYI, I plan to dial into the telechat and listen in on mute, in case anyone
wants to ask questions during the call.
Best wishes,
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth <oauth-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 6:07 PM
To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-d...@ietf.org; oauth-cha...@ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14:
(with COMMENT)
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-dpop-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-dpop/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the clear specification.
While I agree with Ben Schwartz comment in the secdir review that the term
"nonce" is wrong in the document, and that it should really be called "cookie",
I think it is too late in the game to change this.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
