This errata seems to be spam. ________________________________ From: OAuth <oauth-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 10:32 PM To: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> Cc: brunoatlass...@outlook.com.br <brunoatlass...@outlook.com.br>; oauth@ietf.org <oauth@ietf.org> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7569)
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7569 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: BRUNO LEITE DA SILVA <brunoatlass...@outlook.com.br> Section: 6749 Original Text ------------- BANCO.COM Corrected Text -------------- BANCO.COM/ Notes ----- /ALLISSUR Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) -------------------------------------- Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
