{does oauth need to remain in the CC?}
Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The *draft* proposal is talking about a *live* document, with some
> ideas borrowed from the IANA registry process.
Hmm... registration process.
It sounds like you are maybe thinking _Specification Required_?
So would documents that introduce new terms then be referenced from the
Glossary?
I kind of like that, but I also think it might be too restrictive if that's
the only way to add to it. But, perhaps different entries have different
levels of authority, and a term that comes from a Specification gets a higher
status.
In general, I think about the many (often vastly different) definitions that
one can see in, for instance, the urban dictionary (.com).
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
