If it makes sense, we could add an "Implementation Status" section, like it is proposed in this RFC: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7942.html
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:43 AM Michael Jones <michael_b_jo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > OpenID Federation implementations use the Protected Resource Metadata > definitions in this specification. Among others, Connect2ID and Authlete > have OpenID Federation implementations. I know that it’s deployed in the > Italian SPID CIE national federation. > > > > -- Mike > > > > *From:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 10, 2024 7:35 AM > *To:* oauth <oauth@ietf.org> > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata - > Implementations > > > > All, > > As part of the shepherd write-up for the OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource > Metadata document, we are looking for information about implementations of > this draft. > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-06.html > > > Please, reply on the mailing list with any implementations that you are > aware of to support this document. > > Regards, > Rifaat > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
