I support removing the DID Document Resolution option from the SD-JWT VC specification and look forward to a dedicated separate extension on DID resolution.
Best, Kristina On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:28 AM Andy Barlow <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from the > SD JWT VC specification. > I look forward to reading a future extension that documents DID resolution. > > Cheers, > Andy Barlow > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 at 17:54, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> All, >> >> This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open >> issue in draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the *removal* of the *DID >> Document Resolution*. >> >> In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three Issuer-signed >> JWT Verification Key Validation techniques: >> >> 1. JWT VC Issuer Metadata >> 2. X509 based certificates >> 3. DID Document Resolution >> >> >> Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option from >> the SD JWT VC specification? >> >> Please note that this *does not *prevent future *extensions*. Interested >> parties are free to define and publish an extension that adds DID Document >> Resolution support, if desired. >> >> Please, reply on the *mailing list *with your preference by *October 3rd* >> . >> >> Regards, >> Rifaat & Hannes >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
