The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7636, "Proof Key for Code Exchange by OAuth Public Clients".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8457 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Editorial Reported by: Jeff Walden <[email protected]> Date Reported: 2025-06-13 Rejected by: Deb Cooley (IESG) Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- code-verifier = 43*128unreserved Corrected Text -------------- code_verifier = 43*128unreserved Notes ----- The ABNF accidentally uses a hyphen/dash rather than an underscore in the code_verifier name in its rule. --VERIFIER NOTES-- This is not an error and the errata should be rejected. As per the ABNF definition in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5234.html#section-21 the name contains "alphabetics, digits, and hyphens (dashes)", and not underscores. The commenter may be expecting the ABNF rule name of code-verifier to match the parameter name of code_verifier, but they do not need to be the same. While this is confusing, the text is correct as it stands. -------------------------------------- RFC7636 (draft-ietf-oauth-spop-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Proof Key for Code Exchange by OAuth Public Clients Publication Date : September 2015 Author(s) : N. Sakimura, Ed., J. Bradley, N. Agarwal Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
