+1 to adding a note. Much like RAR allows, I like my specs verbose and
explicit.

On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 11:13, Frederik Krogsdal Jacobsen <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 to the overall proposal and Brian's suggestion.
> I think it's always beneficial to explicitly call out such things, if
> nothing else just to note that there are no particular complications when
> combining the specs.
>
> Cheers,
> Frederik
>
> On Sun, 7 Dec 2025 at 22:59, Lombardo, Jeff <jeffsec=
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 on the proposal
>>
>>
>>
>> *Jean-François “Jeff” Lombardo* | Amazon Web Services
>>
>>
>>
>> Architecte Principal de Solutions, Spécialiste de Sécurité
>> Principal Solution Architect, Security Specialist
>> Montréal, Canada
>>
>> *Commentaires à propos de notre échange? **Exprimez-vous **ici*
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/feedback.aws.amazon.com/?ea=jeffsec&fn=Jean*20Francois&ln=Lombardo__;JQ!!Pe07N362zA!0k9CkAV8Djpw_8EfIAKrbhP3TQrJr0oMnznlUgBJ3V3NoEk6hihx7dNHnQuejn6SSH2CP8Iow3G-tTzppHeg$>
>> *.*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Thoughts on our interaction? Provide feedback **here*
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/feedback.aws.amazon.com/?ea=jeffsec&fn=Jean*20Francois&ln=Lombardo__;JQ!!Pe07N362zA!0k9CkAV8Djpw_8EfIAKrbhP3TQrJr0oMnznlUgBJ3V3NoEk6hihx7dNHnQuejn6SSH2CP8Iow3G-tTzppHeg$>
>> *.*
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Karl McGuinness <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* December 5, 2025 12:12 PM
>> *To:* Brian Campbell <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:* Aaron Parecki <[email protected]>; Judith Kahrer
>> <[email protected]>; oauth <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* [EXT] [OAUTH-WG] Re: Identity Assertion JWT Authorization
>> Grant - RAR
>>
>>
>>
>> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
>> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
>> know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> *AVERTISSEMENT*: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur
>> externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous
>> ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas
>> certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
>>
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> I think it helps connect the dots for folks that don't have all the specs
>> paged into context.  I was going to add a non-normative example in a future
>> update as I already have been asked this a few times.  I can open a Github
>> issue to track.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Karl
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 8:52 AM Brian Campbell <bcampbell=
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Agree with Aaron's perspective here. But it might be useful to have a
>> small note saying as much. I wonder if we should also consider
>> describe/define using the authorization_details claim in the ID-JAG similar
>> to scope?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 9:24 AM Aaron Parecki <aaron=
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, RAR can definitely be layered onto this flow. Section 3 of RAR says
>> "The authorization_details authorization request parameter can be used to
>> specify authorization requirements in all places where the scope parameter
>> is used for the same purpose"
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9396#section-3
>>
>>
>>
>> It's not strictly necessary to list authorization_details as a supported
>> parameter in the Token Exchange request and in the ID-JAG claims in order
>> to use it in those places, as they are already extensible. However if you
>> think it would be helpful to have an explicit pointer to RAR I can
>> definitely add it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 12:26 AM Judith Kahrer <judith.kahrer=
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have another thought about processing the ID-JAG... The ID-JAG is a
>> grant. As such, shouldn't it support RAR (RFC 9396
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9396#name-authorization-request>
>> )?
>> For example, add authorization_details as an optional claim in the list
>> of claims in section 3 and as a parameter to the relevant request and
>> responses.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Judith
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>>
>> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
>> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
>> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
>> If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
>> immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from
>> your computer. Thank you.*_______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to