this is junk, please delete.

Paul

On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 5:44 AM RFC Errata System <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749,
> "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8707
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Rajeev Kumar Surroach <[email protected]>
>
> Section: 2.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Browser base auth connect countinue for application, basic setup problems
> sign in or other options update related apps a
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Browser base auth application install or link other apps problems
>
> Notes
> -----
> Solve
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
> Publication Date    : October 2012
> Author(s)           : D. Hardt, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to