Hi, regarding the Etisalat/RIM Backdoor and the abuse of the code signing certificate by Etisalat and https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/08/open-letter-verizon:
Cryptographically the SSL CA certificate (serial number 0x40003f1) is not broken. It is the company itself (Etisalat) which showed bad indent and gross neglect. Is there any statistic available how many HTTPS sites use certificates that are signed Etisalat or any of its subsideries or the umbrella company Etisalat Services Holding LLC? thanks & regards, ralf
