Hi OCaml'ers.

Why is this
let x = 1 and y = x in y;;
typed as
(int -> int) -> int = <fun>
?
I'd expect it to have type of int and be evaluated to 1.

How is it different to
let x = 1 in let y = x in y;;
which meets my typing expectations?

Can first expression be rewritten somehow to give some more intuition
about its type?
Could you point to a place in the language definition which can be
used to deduce answer to this questions?

Sorry if those questions are too nub for this group.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ocaml-developer" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ocaml-developer?hl=en
For other OCaml forums, see http://caml.inria.fr/resources/forums.en.html

Reply via email to