On 06/28/2010 06:15 PM, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Sunil Mushran<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> BTW, have you tested with cleared INCOMPAT_64BIT journal flag? >> > Hm, easier said than done. "tunefs.ocfs2 -J noblock64 ..." bombs out with: > > tunefs.ocfs2: Unknown journal option: "block64" > Valid journal options are: > size=<journal-size> > Usage: tunefs.ocfs2 [options]<device> [new-size] > [etc.] > > By the way, it complains similarly about "tunefs.ocfs2 -J block64", > which puts the lie to the failure message in my patch... > > When I try to re-format the partition without "-J block64", I get: > > ERROR: jbd can only store block numbers in 32 bits. /dev/md0 can hold > 5082795264 blocks which overflows this limit. If you have a new enough > Ocfs2 with JBD2 support, you can try formatting with the "-Jblock64" > option to turn on support for this size block device. > Otherwise, consider increasing the block size or decreasing the device size. >
Which version of tools are you running? block64 was added after ocfs2-tools 1.4.2. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
